With the June 3 trial date fast approaching, Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, is making a last-ditch effort to dismiss his indictment. In a bold move, Hunter has asked the full panel of judges at the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Delaware to throw out his felony gun case. He’s arguing constitutional issues, conflicts with his California tax case, and alleged First Amendment violations.
Hunter Biden’s legal team filed court papers on May 20, requesting a delay in his gun trial. They argue that three new developments justify a rehearing by all 14 appellate court judges after a three-judge panel denied his previous bid on May 9.
In their filing, Hunter’s attorneys argue there’s no rush for a June 3 trial and that the district court unfairly imposes pretrial burdens before the appellate court has even issued its mandate. The defense, led by Abbe David Lowell, is fighting hard against what they see as a politically charged indictment.
Hunter Biden faces three felony gun charges from 2018, accused of buying and possessing a revolver while using illegal drugs. His lawyers emphasize that he’s been sober for five years and hasn’t owned a gun since 2018. They argue the charges and his California tax case are politically motivated attacks.
In Delaware, Hunter’s lawyers want the entire 3rd Circuit to hear their case for dismissing the prosecution. This comes after a panel ruled they lacked jurisdiction to review his claims. They’re also challenging U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika’s decision rejecting their argument that the gun charges violate Hunter’s Second Amendment rights.
Hunter’s team is aiming at Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who was appointed special counsel for the prosecution. The defense claims Weiss’s appointment was improper. At the same time, prosecutors maintain that the evidence against Hunter is “overwhelming,” including cocaine residue found in his gun pouch. Judge Noreika, appointed by former President Trump, dismissed these claims as speculative and unsupported.
The defense also highlights the scheduling conflict between the gun trial and the tax trial in California, which starts on June 20. They argue that holding back-to-back trials is an unfair burden, especially as Republicans push for the trials to happen before the election to counter the cases against Donald Trump.
Adding another layer to the drama, Hunter’s lawyers point to a pending Supreme Court case that could impact whether criminal charges can be based on drug use. They argue that the trial court can’t predict the Supreme Court’s decision, risking serious errors in Hunter’s trial.
Meanwhile, in California, Hunter Biden faces separate tax charges. He’s accused of not paying $1.4 million in taxes over three years while living extravagantly. His legal team is fighting these charges, too, arguing the rulings against him should be overturned.
Republicans have been vocal, accusing the Bidens of corruption and calling for more charges against Hunter. They see these trials as crucial to highlighting alleged misconduct and influencing public opinion before the 2024 elections.
Hunter’s situation is a lightning rod for controversy, reflecting broader political battles. The outcome of these cases could have significant implications, not just for Hunter Biden, but for the political landscape as we head into a crucial election period.
The legal battles are heating up, and Hunter Biden is fighting on multiple fronts. With the clock ticking towards his trial dates, his defense team is pulling out all the stops, challenging the charges, the prosecution, and even the legal grounds of the cases against him. As the proceedings unfold, all eyes will be on the courts to see how these high-stakes legal dramas play out.
Ultimately, it’s not just Hunter Biden on trial but a test of the justice system’s integrity amidst intense political pressure. Will justice be served, or will political agendas prevail? Only time will tell as these cases move forward. Stay tuned for the next chapter in this ongoing saga.
